[78] After The Primal Order was published in 1992, Wizards of the Coast was sued by Palladium for copyright infringement, a case that was settled out of court and with the result that a second printing of The Primal Order removed the rules relevant to Palladium's system, but this case also financially harmed Wizards of the Coast
Sharazad Yet another legal card that does something a little off the wall
Banette, despite being lost, does not harbor any ill will toward her and simply wants to see its old owner again
True to its ability, the artifact enters as a copy of any other artifact on the battlefield, which makes it a flexible tool in artifact-heavy decks
I was still in the top 4 though, and who's my opponent
This is largely due to the fact that it's able to provide a Supporter-like effect without actually using up your Supporter for the turn